This article was inspired by Fareed Zakaria’s May 23, 2026 commencement address to Bard College graduates, in which he reflected on artificial intelligence, human intelligence, and the enduring value of our imperfect humanity.
Fareed Zakaria’s commencement speech to Bard College’s class of 2026 offered a timely and powerful reminder for this moment in history: artificial intelligence may be advancing at breathtaking speed, but the future will not belong only to those who master technology.
It will belong to those who remember how to be deeply, wisely, and courageously human.
Zakaria framed his speech around a simple but profound contrast. While everyone is talking about AI — artificial intelligence — he invited graduates to think about HI: human intelligence. Not merely intelligence as calculation, analysis, memorization, or speed, but intelligence as judgment, empathy, wisdom, intuition, creativity, moral courage, relationship, and love.
That message has deep relevance for today’s financial advisor, agency owner, and business leader.
Because the same question graduates are asking about their future is the question many leaders are quietly asking about their business:
What will still be uniquely valuable when technology can do more and more?
The answer is not to become more machine-like.
The answer is to become more fully human.
AI Can Analyze. Leaders Must Interpret.
Zakaria made the point that AI can now write essays, compose music, diagnose disease, solve complex problems, and generate content at remarkable speed. That naturally creates anxiety. If machines can do so much, what is left for people?
But perhaps, as Zakaria suggested, that is the wrong question.
The better question is: What does AI reveal about what human beings do that machines cannot truly replace?
In leadership, this distinction matters.
AI can produce reports, summarize meetings, compare resumes, draft emails, and analyze data. It can help create process, structure, and speed. Used wisely, it can be a remarkable assistant.
But AI cannot sit across from a discouraged team member and sense what is not being said.
It cannot feel the emotional weight of a founder struggling to let go.
It cannot understand the silent tension between a high-performing producer and an overwhelmed operations team.
It cannot know when a successor is technically ready but psychologically unprepared.
It cannot discern whether a client needs more information — or simply needs to feel understood.
That is the work of human intelligence.
The Danger Is Not AI Becoming Human — It Is Humans Becoming Machine-Like
One of Zakaria’s most important warnings was that the real danger of the AI age may not be that machines become too human. It may be that human beings start trying to become too machine-like.
This is already happening in business.
Leaders are under constant pressure to optimize everything: productivity, performance, marketing, sales, staffing, client service, delegation, metrics, and time management. Of course, structure matters. Systems matter. Accountability matters. Without them, businesses drift into chaos.
But optimization without humanity becomes sterile.
A leader can become efficient and still emotionally unavailable.
A team can become productive and still disconnected.
A business can become profitable and still lose its soul.
A founder can build an impressive enterprise and still become the bottleneck because everything depends on their approval, energy, and emotional state.
This is especially relevant for agency owners and advisory firm leaders who are scaling from personal production into organizational leadership. The temptation is to treat every problem as a technical problem.
Need growth? Add more marketing.
Need capacity? Hire more people.
Need consistency? Create more procedures.
Need accountability? Add more meetings.
All of these may be necessary. But they are not enough.
Because many business problems are not just structural. They are human.
They involve fear, control, trust, resentment, confidence, values, communication, identity, and purpose.
AI may help you design a better process. But only human intelligence can help you understand why the process is not being followed.
Imperfection Is Not a Leadership Flaw
Zakaria also spoke beautifully about imperfection. He referenced art, handmade objects, broken pottery repaired with gold, and the human attraction to authenticity, soul, and visible evidence of struggle.
This is a powerful leadership lesson.
Many leaders believe they must appear certain, polished, composed, and in control at all times. They fear that showing doubt, vulnerability, or confusion will weaken their authority.
But the opposite is often true.
Teams do not need perfect leaders.
They need honest ones.
They need leaders who can say:
“We are in transition.”
“I do not have this fully figured out yet.”
“I need your help.”
“I realize I have been holding on too tightly.”
“I want us to build something stronger together.”
This kind of honesty does not diminish leadership. It deepens trust.
In a world increasingly filled with polished automation, scripted messaging, and algorithmic communication, authenticity will become even more valuable.
People will hunger for what feels real.
Clients will still want to be listened to by someone who cares.
Team members will still want to be led by someone who sees them as human beings, not just roles on an organizational chart.
Successors will still need founders who can transfer not only books of business, but wisdom, confidence, and belief.
Human Intelligence Is the New Leadership Advantage
Zakaria’s speech reminds us that human beings are not valuable because we can outcalculate machines. We cannot.
We are valuable because we can decide what matters.
We can ask better questions.
We can make meaning.
We can build trust.
We can repair relationships.
We can comfort, challenge, forgive, encourage, and inspire.
We can look at a business plan and ask, “Is this aligned with who we really are?”
We can look at a hiring decision and ask, “Does this person fit our values, not just the job description?”
We can look at a succession plan and ask, “Are we dealing with the human transition, or only the transaction?”
That is the leadership opportunity of this moment.
Not to reject AI.
Not to fear it.
Not to pretend it will not change everything.
But to use it wisely while becoming more conscious of what only human beings can bring.
The Future Belongs to Leaders Who Combine Systems with Soul
For agency owners and advisory firm leaders, the path forward is not technology versus humanity.
It is both.
Use AI to summarize, organize, analyze, draft, and accelerate.
Use systems to create rhythm, clarity, accountability, and scalability.
Use structure to reduce chaos.
But do not outsource your judgment.
Do not automate your relationships.
Do not confuse speed with wisdom.
Do not mistake polished communication for meaningful connection.
And do not let the pursuit of efficiency strip the humanity out of your leadership.
The firms that thrive in the years ahead will not simply be the ones with the best technology. They will be the ones with the clearest purpose, the strongest culture, the healthiest communication, the most aligned teams, and the most human leaders.
Zakaria closed his speech by encouraging Bard’s graduates to become champions of human intelligence, human imagination, human inspiration, and human interconnection.
That same invitation belongs to every leader today.
The AI age is here.
But the future still needs your judgment.
Your courage.
Your empathy.
Your values.
Your wisdom.
Your imperfect, irreplaceable humanity.
And perhaps that is the real leadership challenge of our time:
Not to become faster than the machine, but to become more fully human than ever before.
The Invitation
If you enjoy thoughtful insights on leadership, team alignment, organizational growth, and building scalable advisory businesses, I invite you to subscribe to Weekly Strategic Insights.
Each week I share practical leadership frameworks and grounded perspectives designed specifically for financial advisory firm owners and insurance agency leaders navigating growth, complexity, and change.